Comments on: Christopher Kane’s £3,000 sweater: worth the money?

By: xk

xk — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:24:45 +0000

I wouldn’t take this if they gave it to me for free. Maybe if they paid me $10, but it would cost more than that to make me wear it. Most. Hideous. Sweater. Ever.

By: livlah

livlah — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:49:29 +0000

if i happened to be far from home, very cold, wearing only a singlet and stumbled upon this jumper in a thrift store for $1.50 i would consider it, and then send it back to my nearest thift store as soon as i got back home..this is about $6500 in australian dollars…no, no sane person would even consider this.

By: Rock Hyrax

Rock Hyrax — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:25:20 +0000

The only thing worse than buying a “Christmas jumper” like that is paying £3000 for one.

By: Anna

Anna — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:18:02 +0000

It’s ugly. I wouldn’t buy it even if it wasn’t £3000.

By: Amanda Nicole

Amanda Nicole — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:36:18 +0000

Wow. Just…wow. I think I see some macaroni and glitter in there.

By: Anusha

Anusha — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:01:11 +0000

Looks like a particularly hideous version of one of those “holiday” sweaters that women bring out every year. Either that or part of Sigfried and Roy’s Winter Special.

By: The Fashion Police

The Fashion Police — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:34:34 +0000

Haha, absolutely, Carol – and because of the price, you’d feel like you HAD to wear it a lot, too!

By: Carol

Carol — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:23:22 +0000

Nope, don’t like and wouldn’t buy. My mother would describe it as a sweater you wear once, then every time thereafter people say “Oh, you’re wearing THAT sweater again…”

By: Cindra

Cindra — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:50:29 +0000

No, sorry, no! Agree with the cleaning costs, as well! Just give me a nice, plain cashmere sweater and I’ll splash out the remaining cash on some other lovely thing!

By: Terry

Terry — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:42:00 +0000

Sweater, FAIL!