October 17th, 2008
Style on Trial: Rachel Pally’s ‘Kate’ jumpsuit
Our thoughts on jumpsuits almost always seem to end up causing controversy, so this time round we’re going to say absolutely nothing about Rachel Pally’s backless ‘Kate’ jumpsuit (other than to state that it’s $209 and available from Shopbop), and let you be The Fashion Police instead.
What do you think, fashion jurors? Crime of fashion? Totally and utterly fabulous in every way imaginable? Something else? You decide!
Gross. Hideous. And most definitely criminal..
I think the back is so “empty” just with the sleeves and the trousers are to long in my opinion.
Apart from that: To which occasion do you wear this thing? It’s not very classy but it’s also not very casual…
difficult X)
I forgot: Yeah I think it’s a fashion criminal
… (and impractical anyway)
What a stupid garment.
It mings!!!!
I think the model’s face says it all: “How could you make me wear this monstrosity?!”
What’s “mings”? Also: crime.
I kinda like it, but wish it were a dress instead
WHY?? Just why?? Shouldn’t be worn but thrown into fashion jail in the “totally useless and ugly at the same time” section. (where all the open-toe boots are, y’know)
Criminal. For obvious reasons.
The silhouette’s OK, but the ridiculous length of the pants and the cut-out back make this one a horrorshow for me.
And how do you go to the bathroom in this?
Why is this even on trial?