<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ankle length flares: all kinds of wrong</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/10/ankle-length-fl.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/10/ankle-length-fl.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: sue</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/10/ankle-length-fl.html#comment-13483</link> <dc:creator>sue</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2908#comment-13483</guid> <description>I love flares, but these are too short. Flares are meant to be long </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love flares, but these are too short. Flares are meant to be long</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lisa</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/10/ankle-length-fl.html#comment-13482</link> <dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:24:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2908#comment-13482</guid> <description>I second that EWWW! It looks like some lady tried to squeeze into her 7 year old&#039;s Mary Kate and Ashley brand bell bottoms. Not a good look </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that EWWW! It looks like some lady tried to squeeze into her 7 year old&#8217;s Mary Kate and Ashley brand bell bottoms. Not a good look</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Non</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/10/ankle-length-fl.html#comment-13481</link> <dc:creator>Non</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:40:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2908#comment-13481</guid> <description>Um...these are bell bottoms...seriously.  I&#039;m not sure who started the &quot;trend&quot; of calling bell bottoms &quot;flares&quot;, but really, you&#039;re not fooling anybody, they&#039;re bell bottoms...horrible, horrible looking BELL BOTTOMS.  o_O </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;these are bell bottoms&#8230;seriously.  I&#8217;m not sure who started the &#8220;trend&#8221; of calling bell bottoms &#8220;flares&#8221;, but really, you&#8217;re not fooling anybody, they&#8217;re bell bottoms&#8230;horrible, horrible looking BELL BOTTOMS.  o_O</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lai-Lai</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/10/ankle-length-fl.html#comment-13480</link> <dc:creator>Lai-Lai</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:49:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2908#comment-13480</guid> <description>Too tight in the crotch area, &amp; the hem is too high. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too tight in the crotch area, &#038; the hem is too high.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mousykins</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/10/ankle-length-fl.html#comment-13479</link> <dc:creator>Mousykins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:02:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2908#comment-13479</guid> <description>I LOVE THEM. [/sarcasm]
God, EW! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE THEM. [/sarcasm]<br
/> God, EW!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Agent Elle</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/10/ankle-length-fl.html#comment-13478</link> <dc:creator>Agent Elle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:44:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2908#comment-13478</guid> <description>Those are atrocious. I remember in high school when people would make fun of too-short trousers and name them &#039;ankle-danglers&#039; (or &#039;danglies&#039;). Thankfully all my trousers fit me, but there was some air of shame involved with wearing said ankle-danglers. I&#039;m pretty sure none of us want to relive those days. Unless they&#039;re somewhat deranged. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are atrocious. I remember in high school when people would make fun of too-short trousers and name them &#8216;ankle-danglers&#8217; (or &#8216;danglies&#8217;). Thankfully all my trousers fit me, but there was some air of shame involved with wearing said ankle-danglers. I&#8217;m pretty sure none of us want to relive those days. Unless they&#8217;re somewhat deranged.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mer</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/10/ankle-length-fl.html#comment-13477</link> <dc:creator>Mer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:06:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2908#comment-13477</guid> <description>Oh god, that looks like something a soccer mom would wear with trainers... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh god, that looks like something a soccer mom would wear with trainers&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
