<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Fashion Band Aids: Swarovski Crystal Bling Band Aids from Charles &amp; Marie</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/09/fashion-band-ai.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/09/fashion-band-ai.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:39:41 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: KittyRose</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/09/fashion-band-ai.html#comment-8785</link> <dc:creator>KittyRose</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:06:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2295#comment-8785</guid> <description>Nelly will be pleased.
He can have eveningwear plasters to go with the rest of his crap bling. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nelly will be pleased.<br
/> He can have eveningwear plasters to go with the rest of his crap bling.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Beatnik</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/09/fashion-band-ai.html#comment-8784</link> <dc:creator>Beatnik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:23:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2295#comment-8784</guid> <description>I hate to defend something so silly and unnecessary, but...
I do know that a number of workplaces do not allow employees to have visible facial piercings at work, meaning that employees either have to remove their studs or cover them, usually with band aids. I could picture some attempting to make their cover ups a little more stylish with these crystal-studded band aids. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to defend something so silly and unnecessary, but&#8230;<br
/> I do know that a number of workplaces do not allow employees to have visible facial piercings at work, meaning that employees either have to remove their studs or cover them, usually with band aids. I could picture some attempting to make their cover ups a little more stylish with these crystal-studded band aids.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glamfille</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/09/fashion-band-ai.html#comment-8783</link> <dc:creator>Glamfille</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:54:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2295#comment-8783</guid> <description>Looking forward to see Swarovski crystals embedded toilet paper. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to see Swarovski crystals embedded toilet paper.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JC</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/09/fashion-band-ai.html#comment-8782</link> <dc:creator>JC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:43:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2295#comment-8782</guid> <description>Ok, is it just me or is it starting to feel like a bunch of people at Swarovski had a little too much to drink and just thought &#039;hey lets see how many random items we can throw a few crystals on..you know..just for funsies&#039; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, is it just me or is it starting to feel like a bunch of people at Swarovski had a little too much to drink and just thought &#8216;hey lets see how many random items we can throw a few crystals on..you know..just for funsies&#8217;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Am</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/09/fashion-band-ai.html#comment-8781</link> <dc:creator>Am</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:25:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2295#comment-8781</guid> <description>Yes, I&#039;ve got to agree with Gokarm. Also, I imagine you could probably do this yourself, if you were so inclined! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve got to agree with Gokarm. Also, I imagine you could probably do this yourself, if you were so inclined!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gokarm</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/09/fashion-band-ai.html#comment-8780</link> <dc:creator>gokarm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:23:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2295#comment-8780</guid> <description>It brings to mind that stupid band aid fashion trend a few years back...who was it, Nelly? Yeah, my biggest concern with band aids is just that they stay on. (cheap ones aren&#039;t sticky enough)...but cosmetic additions like that? No. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It brings to mind that stupid band aid fashion trend a few years back&#8230;who was it, Nelly? Yeah, my biggest concern with band aids is just that they stay on. (cheap ones aren&#8217;t sticky enough)&#8230;but cosmetic additions like that? No.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
