<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Shant Spotting: Sheer pants by Ann Demeulemeester</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/shant-spotting-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/shant-spotting-2.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Miss</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/shant-spotting-2.html#comment-10065</link> <dc:creator>Miss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2461#comment-10065</guid> <description>Well, these are nothing new. When I was studying fashion myself, my classmates made trousers similar to these. Except they were lace. And a skinny fit. Note! Not leggings, but trousers.
She was very proud of them, the poor model not so much. This was 5 years ago. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, these are nothing new. When I was studying fashion myself, my classmates made trousers similar to these. Except they were lace. And a skinny fit. Note! Not leggings, but trousers.<br
/> She was very proud of them, the poor model not so much. This was 5 years ago.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Diana</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/shant-spotting-2.html#comment-10064</link> <dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2461#comment-10064</guid> <description>Until when are we going to be tortured with these things???? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until when are we going to be tortured with these things????</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Fashion Police</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/shant-spotting-2.html#comment-10063</link> <dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:41:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2461#comment-10063</guid> <description>Gokarm - it&#039;s a talent, but also a curse. Some folks see dead people - I just see badly dressed one.
And yes, there is the suggestion of a dropped crotch here, just to add to the general fug. I guess you could wear them on the beach as a kind of cover up, but, er, I wouldn&#039;t. And why must Yoox always photograph the models they force into these see-through garments in THONGS, for the love of God?! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gokarm &#8211; it&#8217;s a talent, but also a curse. Some folks see dead people &#8211; I just see badly dressed one.<br
/> And yes, there is the suggestion of a dropped crotch here, just to add to the general fug. I guess you could wear them on the beach as a kind of cover up, but, er, I wouldn&#8217;t. And why must Yoox always photograph the models they force into these see-through garments in THONGS, for the love of God?!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amanda</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/shant-spotting-2.html#comment-10062</link> <dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:48:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2461#comment-10062</guid> <description>I noticed that too, Am! As if matters needed to be made worse. Quick, hide these from Kim Kardashian, before we are able to sketch her entire naked body by memory. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that too, Am! As if matters needed to be made worse. Quick, hide these from Kim Kardashian, before we are able to sketch her entire naked body by memory.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Am</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/shant-spotting-2.html#comment-10061</link> <dc:creator>Am</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:53:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2461#comment-10061</guid> <description>wow. I don&#039;t think I could have imagined anything more horrible. To make matters worse, is that a dropped crotch I see? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. I don&#8217;t think I could have imagined anything more horrible. To make matters worse, is that a dropped crotch I see?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gokarm</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/shant-spotting-2.html#comment-10060</link> <dc:creator>gokarm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:34:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2461#comment-10060</guid> <description>*Gasp* I am horrified. How on earth do you uncover these sartorial demons?!? My mind&#039;s eye refuses to see them in the real world, I suppose. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Gasp* I am horrified. How on earth do you uncover these sartorial demons?!? My mind&#8217;s eye refuses to see them in the real world, I suppose.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
