<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Fashion Police Glossary: Shants</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/fashion-police-glossary-shants.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/fashion-police-glossary-shants.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Cadi</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/fashion-police-glossary-shants.html#comment-9786</link> <dc:creator>Cadi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:23:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2436#comment-9786</guid> <description>in the name of all things holy...white undies, thigh highs, and shants...please tell me this person repented after putting those on...oh this will haunt me for ages...
The harem-style ones to me are less made for public wear than for costume or boudoir...and that I can forgive.  But ugh.  Any other reason, nuh uh. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the name of all things holy&#8230;white undies, thigh highs, and shants&#8230;please tell me this person repented after putting those on&#8230;oh this will haunt me for ages&#8230;<br
/> The harem-style ones to me are less made for public wear than for costume or boudoir&#8230;and that I can forgive.  But ugh.  Any other reason, nuh uh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Helen</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/fashion-police-glossary-shants.html#comment-9785</link> <dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:00:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2436#comment-9785</guid> <description>They are basically very baggy tights - NOT to be worn on their own! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are basically very baggy tights &#8211; NOT to be worn on their own!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sarah</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/fashion-police-glossary-shants.html#comment-9784</link> <dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:44:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2436#comment-9784</guid> <description>People pay for these? One of them I might, only because they look like harem pants and they might be nice to wear for my guy...but the rest? What? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People pay for these? One of them I might, only because they look like harem pants and they might be nice to wear for my guy&#8230;but the rest? What?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
