<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fashion Police Glossary: Shants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/fashion-police-glossary-shants.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/fashion-police-glossary-shants.html</link>
	<description>Fashion dos and don&#039;ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cadi</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/fashion-police-glossary-shants.html#comment-9786</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2436#comment-9786</guid>
		<description>in the name of all things holy...white undies, thigh highs, and shants...please tell me this person repented after putting those on...oh this will haunt me for ages...
The harem-style ones to me are less made for public wear than for costume or boudoir...and that I can forgive.  But ugh.  Any other reason, nuh uh.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the name of all things holy&#8230;white undies, thigh highs, and shants&#8230;please tell me this person repented after putting those on&#8230;oh this will haunt me for ages&#8230;<br />
The harem-style ones to me are less made for public wear than for costume or boudoir&#8230;and that I can forgive.  But ugh.  Any other reason, nuh uh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/fashion-police-glossary-shants.html#comment-9785</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2436#comment-9785</guid>
		<description>They are basically very baggy tights - NOT to be worn on their own!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are basically very baggy tights &#8211; NOT to be worn on their own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/08/fashion-police-glossary-shants.html#comment-9784</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2436#comment-9784</guid>
		<description>People pay for these? One of them I might, only because they look like harem pants and they might be nice to wear for my guy...but the rest? What?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People pay for these? One of them I might, only because they look like harem pants and they might be nice to wear for my guy&#8230;but the rest? What?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
