<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: La Redoute take harem pants to new levels of fugliness</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: buu</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html#comment-88241</link> <dc:creator>buu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:00:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1481#comment-88241</guid> <description>lol</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Juggalette</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html#comment-30191</link> <dc:creator>Juggalette</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:21:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1481#comment-30191</guid> <description>Were those pants made for the biggest, saggiest neden ever?Cause they look like it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were those pants made for the biggest, saggiest neden ever?Cause they look like it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vanessa Curney</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html#comment-3864</link> <dc:creator>Vanessa Curney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:24:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1481#comment-3864</guid> <description>Yuck </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuck</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Fashion Police</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html#comment-3863</link> <dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:59:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1481#comment-3863</guid> <description>Kathy, you may jest, but that could totally happen. And yes, if it did, I think Mischa Barton/Chloe Sevigny/Sienna Miller would be amongst the early adopters for sure.
Nicole raises a very good point, though: WHO IS ACTUALLY BUYING THESE? I mean, La Redoute keep on churning them out season after season, which seems to suggest they are selling. But to who? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathy, you may jest, but that could totally happen. And yes, if it did, I think Mischa Barton/Chloe Sevigny/Sienna Miller would be amongst the early adopters for sure.<br
/> Nicole raises a very good point, though: WHO IS ACTUALLY BUYING THESE? I mean, La Redoute keep on churning them out season after season, which seems to suggest they are selling. But to who?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kathy</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html#comment-3862</link> <dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:51:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1481#comment-3862</guid> <description>Okay, please help me make my mind stop working.  What if the people who made the really high waisted pants from a few days ago meet up with these draggy pants people and combine the two &quot;looks?&quot;  Can you see it?  Could a family of four use it for shelter?  Help me, please.  I am fugly-ed out. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, please help me make my mind stop working.  What if the people who made the really high waisted pants from a few days ago meet up with these draggy pants people and combine the two &#8220;looks?&#8221;  Can you see it?  Could a family of four use it for shelter?  Help me, please.  I am fugly-ed out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: angie,uk</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html#comment-3861</link> <dc:creator>angie,uk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:25:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1481#comment-3861</guid> <description>uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurgh.
that is all </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurgh.<br
/> that is all</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nicole</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html#comment-3860</link> <dc:creator>nicole</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:04:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1481#comment-3860</guid> <description>I&#039;m just thankful that I&#039;ve never actually seen anyone wearing pants like these.  Which makes me wonder...does anyone buy them?  Why are they sold if no one buys them? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just thankful that I&#8217;ve never actually seen anyone wearing pants like these.  Which makes me wonder&#8230;does anyone buy them?  Why are they sold if no one buys them?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Am</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html#comment-3859</link> <dc:creator>Am</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:24:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1481#comment-3859</guid> <description>These must have been some kind of joke, that
accidentally  went into production. I can&#039;t imagine that La Redoute will make much of a profit on these serious fashion offenders. I definitely hope they don&#039;t - that would mean that there were lots of crazy women waddling about it these &#039;creations&#039; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These must have been some kind of joke, that<br
/> accidentally  went into production. I can&#8217;t imagine that La Redoute will make much of a profit on these serious fashion offenders. I definitely hope they don&#8217;t &#8211; that would mean that there were lots of crazy women waddling about it these &#8216;creations&#8217;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cadi</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html#comment-3858</link> <dc:creator>Cadi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:33:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1481#comment-3858</guid> <description>I&#039;ll forgive camo if you&#039;re in the military.  And on duty.
Drop crotch, however, no excuse.  I don&#039;t care HOW big your maxi pad is.  NO. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll forgive camo if you&#8217;re in the military.  And on duty.<br
/> Drop crotch, however, no excuse.  I don&#8217;t care HOW big your maxi pad is.  NO.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Danielle</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/la-redoute-harem-pants.html#comment-3857</link> <dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:19:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1481#comment-3857</guid> <description>Camo is never okay. NEVER. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camo is never okay. NEVER.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
