http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/bang-go-the-sol.html Fashion dos and don'ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:20:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/bang-go-the-sol.html#comment-3671 Isa Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:24:27 +0000 http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1452#comment-3671 Attention Lauren Hoyez: GTFO. Seriously. My God, why?! Attention Lauren Hoyez: GTFO. Seriously.
My God, why?!

]]> http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/bang-go-the-sol.html#comment-3670 Steph Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:34:53 +0000 http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1452#comment-3670 Surely one of the reasons for wearing a hat in high summer is to prevent sun damage to your hair? Kinda defeats the point when you have half of it sticking out of the top of your cap... Surely one of the reasons for wearing a hat in high summer is to prevent sun damage to your hair? Kinda defeats the point when you have half of it sticking out of the top of your cap…

]]> http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/bang-go-the-sol.html#comment-3669 Amanda Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:12:08 +0000 http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1452#comment-3669 Ahahahaha! Removable cap! This hat thing just got better. Or worse. Ahahahaha! Removable cap! This hat thing just got better. Or worse.

]]> http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/bang-go-the-sol.html#comment-3668 The Fashion Police Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:14:27 +0000 http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1452#comment-3668 Gokarm, you can just wear the visor - the cap part is removable! Gokarm, you can just wear the visor – the cap part is removable!

]]> http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/bang-go-the-sol.html#comment-3667 Diana Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:47:05 +0000 http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1452#comment-3667 Agree with gokarm Agree with gokarm

]]> http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/bang-go-the-sol.html#comment-3666 Diana Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:47:02 +0000 http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1452#comment-3666 Agree with gokarm Agree with gokarm

]]> http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/bang-go-the-sol.html#comment-3665 gokarm Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:24:27 +0000 http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1452#comment-3665 The problem is, this hat protects "poofy" bangs, the likes of which should not have been seen since 1992. One wonders why the wearer could not just stick with a visor. Is that cap cloth covering the rest of her hair really all that necessary? The problem is, this hat protects “poofy” bangs, the likes of which should not have been seen since 1992. One wonders why the wearer could not just stick with a visor. Is that cap cloth covering the rest of her hair really all that necessary?

]]> http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/07/bang-go-the-sol.html#comment-3664 mishie Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:19:46 +0000 http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1452#comment-3664 "Or like a small animal landed on your head." Indeed. Most of the time it's not just the bangs, either--it's everything under the shape of the cap itself that gets flattened. Maybe if someone found a way to float the cap on top of the hair... “Or like a small animal landed on your head.”
Indeed. Most of the time it’s not just the bangs, either–it’s everything under the shape of the cap itself that gets flattened. Maybe if someone found a way to float the cap on top of the hair…

]]>