<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lindsay Lohan really wasn&#8217;t joking about that leggings line&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/05/lindsay-lohan-r.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/05/lindsay-lohan-r.html</link>
	<description>Fashion dos and don&#039;ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:28:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arielle</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/05/lindsay-lohan-r.html#comment-5511</link>
		<dc:creator>Arielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1762#comment-5511</guid>
		<description>I still think it&#039;s sad that the beautiful redhead  with a fresh, unique look for Hollywood decided to join the ranks of the bottle-blonde attention seekers; however I have to admit the outfit she&#039;s wearing in this picture is strangely appealing - I even like her hairstyle. However, the other two outfits are hideous.
And I could give you a reason for the kneepads... but I don&#039;t think it would be polite to mention it here.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think it&#8217;s sad that the beautiful redhead  with a fresh, unique look for Hollywood decided to join the ranks of the bottle-blonde attention seekers; however I have to admit the outfit she&#8217;s wearing in this picture is strangely appealing &#8211; I even like her hairstyle. However, the other two outfits are hideous.<br />
And I could give you a reason for the kneepads&#8230; but I don&#8217;t think it would be polite to mention it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadi</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/05/lindsay-lohan-r.html#comment-5510</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1762#comment-5510</guid>
		<description>Stirrup leggings, with a mary jane.  The strap is over the stirrup bit.  And gold sheen!  FOUL!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stirrup leggings, with a mary jane.  The strap is over the stirrup bit.  And gold sheen!  FOUL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/05/lindsay-lohan-r.html#comment-5509</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1762#comment-5509</guid>
		<description>forget the kneepads-- is the girl on the right wearing stirrup leggings?????  ewwwww, and I thought the leggings trend couldn&#039;t get any worse!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>forget the kneepads&#8211; is the girl on the right wearing stirrup leggings?????  ewwwww, and I thought the leggings trend couldn&#8217;t get any worse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feike</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/05/lindsay-lohan-r.html#comment-5508</link>
		<dc:creator>feike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1762#comment-5508</guid>
		<description>Kneepads?
&quot;Don&#039;t drink and walk. Buy padded leggings.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kneepads?<br />
&#8220;Don&#8217;t drink and walk. Buy padded leggings.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/05/lindsay-lohan-r.html#comment-5507</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1762#comment-5507</guid>
		<description>Screw the leggings, she looks even more like a tramp here!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw the leggings, she looks even more like a tramp here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bookmole</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/05/lindsay-lohan-r.html#comment-5506</link>
		<dc:creator>bookmole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1762#comment-5506</guid>
		<description>What the...
Those models are going to kill her, right after they take those leggings off.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the&#8230;<br />
Those models are going to kill her, right after they take those leggings off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gokarm</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/05/lindsay-lohan-r.html#comment-5505</link>
		<dc:creator>gokarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1762#comment-5505</guid>
		<description>are those knee pads on the left pair? seriously?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are those knee pads on the left pair? seriously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veronika</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/05/lindsay-lohan-r.html#comment-5504</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1762#comment-5504</guid>
		<description>the ones ahe has on dont look that bad..but the other two pairs? yuuck
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the ones ahe has on dont look that bad..but the other two pairs? yuuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
