<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Gwyneth Paltrow goes too far with the high heels and short skirts thing</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-3.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-3.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: jen hutchin</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-3.html#comment-5864</link> <dc:creator>jen hutchin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:42:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1822#comment-5864</guid> <description>Sorry Gwywn, that&#039;s an 18 year old&#039;s dress. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Gwywn, that&#8217;s an 18 year old&#8217;s dress.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Laura</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-3.html#comment-5863</link> <dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:51:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1822#comment-5863</guid> <description>Agh!  My Eyes!  My Eyes! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agh!  My Eyes!  My Eyes!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Diana</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-3.html#comment-5862</link> <dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1822#comment-5862</guid> <description>Horrid as hell.
WHY?? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horrid as hell.<br
/> WHY??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Laura</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-3.html#comment-5861</link> <dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:53:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1822#comment-5861</guid> <description>I think she really looks great. If i had her body after having two children I&#039;d flaunt it. Ok it is a bit racy but shes usually so conservative give her a break! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she really looks great. If i had her body after having two children I&#8217;d flaunt it. Ok it is a bit racy but shes usually so conservative give her a break!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Janet C</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-3.html#comment-5860</link> <dc:creator>Janet C</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:53:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1822#comment-5860</guid> <description>I grew up in the 70s, so kind of like the high heels and short skirts look (every picture of me in my high school yearbook includes that combination). But that said, the dress is hideous. The neckline is major fugly, the crochet-doily look is freaky, and the overall see-through-ness is just plain tacky. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up in the 70s, so kind of like the high heels and short skirts look (every picture of me in my high school yearbook includes that combination). But that said, the dress is hideous. The neckline is major fugly, the crochet-doily look is freaky, and the overall see-through-ness is just plain tacky.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eva</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-3.html#comment-5859</link> <dc:creator>Eva</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:18:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1822#comment-5859</guid> <description>Oh dear, oh dear! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear, oh dear!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: amelia</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-3.html#comment-5858</link> <dc:creator>amelia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:04:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1822#comment-5858</guid> <description>She looks like she&#039;s thinking &#039;maybe this was a mistake&#039; don&#039;t you think? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She looks like she&#8217;s thinking &#8216;maybe this was a mistake&#8217; don&#8217;t you think?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Helen</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-3.html#comment-5857</link> <dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:54:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1822#comment-5857</guid> <description>Ugh, never mind the shoes - the dress itself is horribly unflattering. I don&#039;t know many people who can get away with that kind of halterneck: it always makes for some strange bulging and whatnot in the underarm area, and also makes the wearer&#039;s breasts look a bit saggy.
I&#039;m not even going to say anything about the see-through effect. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, never mind the shoes &#8211; the dress itself is horribly unflattering. I don&#8217;t know many people who can get away with that kind of halterneck: it always makes for some strange bulging and whatnot in the underarm area, and also makes the wearer&#8217;s breasts look a bit saggy.<br
/> I&#8217;m not even going to say anything about the see-through effect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
