Gwyneth Paltrow goes too far with the high heels and short skirts thing


Remember earlier this week, when we were trying to figure out whether Gwyneth Paltrow looked fabulous or fashion-criminal-ish in her many "stilettos and short skirts" ensembles? Well, looks like Gwyneth herself decided to help us make up our minds, with this little "Look! I could totally be naked under this!" dress.

Too far, Gwyneth, you just went too damn far…


  • Reply April 30, 2008


    Ugh, never mind the shoes – the dress itself is horribly unflattering. I don’t know many people who can get away with that kind of halterneck: it always makes for some strange bulging and whatnot in the underarm area, and also makes the wearer’s breasts look a bit saggy.
    I’m not even going to say anything about the see-through effect.

  • Reply April 30, 2008


    She looks like she’s thinking ‘maybe this was a mistake’ don’t you think?

  • Reply April 30, 2008


    Oh dear, oh dear!

  • Reply April 30, 2008

    Janet C

    I grew up in the 70s, so kind of like the high heels and short skirts look (every picture of me in my high school yearbook includes that combination). But that said, the dress is hideous. The neckline is major fugly, the crochet-doily look is freaky, and the overall see-through-ness is just plain tacky.

  • Reply April 30, 2008


    I think she really looks great. If i had her body after having two children I’d flaunt it. Ok it is a bit racy but shes usually so conservative give her a break!

  • Reply May 1, 2008


    Horrid as hell.

  • Reply May 1, 2008


    Agh! My Eyes! My Eyes!

  • Reply May 2, 2008

    jen hutchin

    Sorry Gwywn, that’s an 18 year old’s dress.

Leave a Reply