<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celebrity Style on Trial: Gwyneth Paltrow&#8217;s high heels and short skirts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html</link>
	<description>Fashion dos and don&#039;ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher HOpkins</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5938</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher HOpkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5938</guid>
		<description>It is disproportionate and unbalanced, and in that light, off putting.  As far as &quot;hot?&quot;  Relative to the eye of the beholder.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is disproportionate and unbalanced, and in that light, off putting.  As far as &#8220;hot?&#8221;  Relative to the eye of the beholder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher HOpkins</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5937</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher HOpkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5937</guid>
		<description>It is disproportionate and unbalanced, and in that light, off putting.  As far as &quot;hot?&quot;  Relative to the eye of the beholder.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is disproportionate and unbalanced, and in that light, off putting.  As far as &#8220;hot?&#8221;  Relative to the eye of the beholder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5936</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5936</guid>
		<description>I don´t like short skirts that much but I do think she looks great on the first picture.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don´t like short skirts that much but I do think she looks great on the first picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amaris</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5935</link>
		<dc:creator>amaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5935</guid>
		<description>i guess, covering up with the jacket makes it a lot more decent...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess, covering up with the jacket makes it a lot more decent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliza</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5934</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5934</guid>
		<description>Hm... I&#039;m not a fan of super short skirts, regardless of heel length.  And why is she wearing so much black? Boring.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm&#8230; I&#8217;m not a fan of super short skirts, regardless of heel length.  And why is she wearing so much black? Boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5933</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5933</guid>
		<description>I like her outfit on the left. Go her!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like her outfit on the left. Go her!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alicia</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5932</link>
		<dc:creator>Alicia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5932</guid>
		<description>I like the first outfit better than the second simply because the long sleeved tuxedo jacket helps to balance out the fact that she&#039;s showing so much leg, and I think the shoes work with it.  But yeah, if I had legs like that, I&#039;d probably be flaunting them every chance I got, too.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the first outfit better than the second simply because the long sleeved tuxedo jacket helps to balance out the fact that she&#8217;s showing so much leg, and I think the shoes work with it.  But yeah, if I had legs like that, I&#8217;d probably be flaunting them every chance I got, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5931</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5931</guid>
		<description>On her and on the red carpet it looks good.  But if I saw a regular gal walking down the street dressed like that (which I did last week incidentally) I would immediately think &#039;&#039;Pro-fessional&#039;&#039;?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On her and on the red carpet it looks good.  But if I saw a regular gal walking down the street dressed like that (which I did last week incidentally) I would immediately think &#8221;Pro-fessional&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
