<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Celebrity Style on Trial: Gwyneth Paltrow&#8217;s high heels and short skirts</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Christopher HOpkins</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5938</link> <dc:creator>Christopher HOpkins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:01:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5938</guid> <description>It is disproportionate and unbalanced, and in that light, off putting.  As far as &quot;hot?&quot;  Relative to the eye of the beholder. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is disproportionate and unbalanced, and in that light, off putting.  As far as &#8220;hot?&#8221;  Relative to the eye of the beholder.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher HOpkins</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5937</link> <dc:creator>Christopher HOpkins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:00:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5937</guid> <description>It is disproportionate and unbalanced, and in that light, off putting.  As far as &quot;hot?&quot;  Relative to the eye of the beholder. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is disproportionate and unbalanced, and in that light, off putting.  As far as &#8220;hot?&#8221;  Relative to the eye of the beholder.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Diana</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5936</link> <dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:34:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5936</guid> <description>I don´t like short skirts that much but I do think she looks great on the first picture. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don´t like short skirts that much but I do think she looks great on the first picture.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: amaris</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5935</link> <dc:creator>amaris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:36:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5935</guid> <description>i guess, covering up with the jacket makes it a lot more decent... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess, covering up with the jacket makes it a lot more decent&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eliza</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5934</link> <dc:creator>Eliza</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:56:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5934</guid> <description>Hm... I&#039;m not a fan of super short skirts, regardless of heel length.  And why is she wearing so much black? Boring. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm&#8230; I&#8217;m not a fan of super short skirts, regardless of heel length.  And why is she wearing so much black? Boring.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Danielle</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5933</link> <dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:14:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5933</guid> <description>I like her outfit on the left. Go her! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like her outfit on the left. Go her!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alicia</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5932</link> <dc:creator>Alicia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:40:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5932</guid> <description>I like the first outfit better than the second simply because the long sleeved tuxedo jacket helps to balance out the fact that she&#039;s showing so much leg, and I think the shoes work with it.  But yeah, if I had legs like that, I&#039;d probably be flaunting them every chance I got, too. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the first outfit better than the second simply because the long sleeved tuxedo jacket helps to balance out the fact that she&#8217;s showing so much leg, and I think the shoes work with it.  But yeah, if I had legs like that, I&#8217;d probably be flaunting them every chance I got, too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Theresa</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/04/gwyneth-paltr-2.html#comment-5931</link> <dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:41:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1836#comment-5931</guid> <description>On her and on the red carpet it looks good.  But if I saw a regular gal walking down the street dressed like that (which I did last week incidentally) I would immediately think &#039;&#039;Pro-fessional&#039;&#039;? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On her and on the red carpet it looks good.  But if I saw a regular gal walking down the street dressed like that (which I did last week incidentally) I would immediately think &#8221;Pro-fessional&#8221;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
