Midas Media ShoeperWoman Hey Dollface Forever Amber Keeping it Realtor Writing World Grumpy Bloggers Rubinman
graphics
graphic

March 6th, 2008

Style on Trial: Brightly coloured high top trainers

Trainers

As fully paid-up members of the Anti-Trainers league (Motto: Trainers – they really are just for the gym, you know…), there’s just no way we could judge these high tops from Topshop (£65) with any degree of impartiality at all. In fact, we can’t think of a single good thing to say about them: for one, they’re sneakers, and for two, they have that "look at me, I’m mad, I am" thing going on there with the colours, and that makes us shudder and reach for our peep toes every time.

Because of our bias against all forms of trainers/sneakers/whatever you want to call them, then, we’re turning this decision over to you, The Jury. You see, we’ve started to notice that brightly coloured high-tops have been sneaking under the fashion radar lately, and turning up in all kinds of stores where we previously wouldn’t have expected to see such a thing. This makes us suspect that they’re attempting a comeback. Will you welcome the high top trainers back with open arms, though, or will you be putting in a call to The Fashion Police requesting their immediate arrest?




4 Responses to “Style on Trial: Brightly coloured high top trainers”

  1. Veronika says:

    I actually do quite like trainers, like if I have a long hard day in front of me than I’d sure rather spend that day in my black adidas superstars than in a pair of heels. But these high tops?? A “no-no” all the way, although if you could hide the high top under your jeans on the blue ones, they might not be soo bad. But those pink/muster stripe ones? Yuck!

  2. Orla says:

    High tops need to DIE!
    They’re awful 80s revival tosh that is only worn by hipsters who think they’re infallible but actually look like COMPLETE SWEAR WORDS!
    Sorry, but i hate this tainting of the sacred art of retro fashion, it’s tosh. Mother always said, If you lived it the first time, it’s a no-no. (and anyone over the age of 18 was born in the frigging 80s)

  3. gokarm says:

    I couldn’t see myself in them, but I don’t have anything against them. They’re comfortable, they’re colorful and they look better than crocs. or uggs. I think if you wore them with a totally neutral look, I might even see my way towards kind of liking them.

  4. Nancy says:

    I’m not fond of these particular shoes. They look a little cheap, and the colors and ugly. If I was going for a pair, I would buy these:
    http://www.fluevog.com/code/?w=attribute%3AUnisex&p=6&pp=1&view=detail&colourID=2084
    They are nicer, and a neutral color. It helps tone down the bizarre style. And they are about the same price!

Leave a Reply

Fashion Police Comment Policy

> No personal attacks or abuse: criticize clothes, not people! (This includes derogatory comments about weight.)
> No self-promotion, i.e. spam
> Please keep your comments on-topic and email us directly with more general feedback/questions.
> Remember, The Fashion Police is a light-hearted site that is not intended to be taken too seriously, so any comments that break these rules will be removed.
> A fuller version of this comment policy can be found here


CommentLuv Enabled





 
graphic
 
 
graphicEdinburgh Web Design
graphicSubscribe
graphicFollow Us
graphicBecome a Fan
graphicContact
graphicPrivacy Policy