<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Tapered leg trousers: still ugly</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/03/tapered-leg-tro.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/03/tapered-leg-tro.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:39:41 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Danielle</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/03/tapered-leg-tro.html#comment-7455</link> <dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:53:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2128#comment-7455</guid> <description>There&#039;s even a place for a belt at the hips UNDER the waistline! Doesn&#039;t that completely defeat the purpose of a belt or even the appearance of a belt? A belt is made to cinch, hold, and in some cases, make the person look slimmer (worn on the natural waist instead of the hips on a dress, for example). This would have the complete opposite effect. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s even a place for a belt at the hips UNDER the waistline! Doesn&#8217;t that completely defeat the purpose of a belt or even the appearance of a belt? A belt is made to cinch, hold, and in some cases, make the person look slimmer (worn on the natural waist instead of the hips on a dress, for example). This would have the complete opposite effect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
