<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Wear or Die: Clubwear Edition</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Diandra</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-22918</link> <dc:creator>Diandra</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:29:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-22918</guid> <description>The see-through dress! Or the silver thing as a swimsuit, if that&#039;s allowed, but it probably isn&#039;t. (Actually, with that crotch, forget it!)
At least with the see-through one I could say, &quot;oops, I didn&#039;t realize it was see through!&quot; I&#039;d take a wardrobe malfunction over something that says, &quot;no, I didn&#039;t look in the mirror before leaving the house!&quot;
The black dress is a little slutty (length-wise) but it might be alright with a solid black tube dress underneath and maybe a shrug? (to cover your shoulder area, not the dress!)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The see-through dress! Or the silver thing as a swimsuit, if that&#8217;s allowed, but it probably isn&#8217;t. (Actually, with that crotch, forget it!)<br
/> At least with the see-through one I could say, &#8220;oops, I didn&#8217;t realize it was see through!&#8221; I&#8217;d take a wardrobe malfunction over something that says, &#8220;no, I didn&#8217;t look in the mirror before leaving the house!&#8221;<br
/> The black dress is a little slutty (length-wise) but it might be alright with a solid black tube dress underneath and maybe a shrug? (to cover your shoulder area, not the dress!)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kat</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1647</link> <dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:45:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1647</guid> <description>dress with bright (red/pink)* cami underneath, and either black/white/(red/pink)* leggings underneath. paired with platform heels.
*if doing the red/pink, they have to match, not have one red and one pink. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dress with bright (red/pink)* cami underneath, and either black/white/(red/pink)* leggings underneath. paired with platform heels.<br
/> *if doing the red/pink, they have to match, not have one red and one pink.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pyro</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1646</link> <dc:creator>pyro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:07:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1646</guid> <description>Sadly, I think I would wear the wedgie top. That dress is just too tiny. At least with the top I would get pants, which would at least almost give me some tiny semblance of wearing clothes. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I think I would wear the wedgie top. That dress is just too tiny. At least with the top I would get pants, which would at least almost give me some tiny semblance of wearing clothes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Krystyna</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1645</link> <dc:creator>Krystyna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:40:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1645</guid> <description>Obviously the see through dress on the left, but pair it with black leggies and a bright tee. Oooh. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously the see through dress on the left, but pair it with black leggies and a bright tee. Oooh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anna</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1644</link> <dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:04:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1644</guid> <description>The only twisted universe in which those abominations considered &quot;glam&quot; is one where two-dollar prostitutes are the height of sophistication.
I&#039;ll take the dress, but with a cami and black opaque tights. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only twisted universe in which those abominations considered &#8220;glam&#8221; is one where two-dollar prostitutes are the height of sophistication.<br
/> I&#8217;ll take the dress, but with a cami and black opaque tights.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Celeste</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1643</link> <dc:creator>Celeste</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:47:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1643</guid> <description>i want to know how the models wearing these can actually have any dignity left.  especially the frontal wedgie thing. ouch.
i&#039;m going to have to say that i would wear the dress, which seems to be the trend here.  i would have to add a pair of jeans as well as a cute jacket in an attempt to make it look less like a piece of cloth sewn together though. yep.  not cover it up, just help it out a little bit. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to know how the models wearing these can actually have any dignity left.  especially the frontal wedgie thing. ouch.<br
/> i&#8217;m going to have to say that i would wear the dress, which seems to be the trend here.  i would have to add a pair of jeans as well as a cute jacket in an attempt to make it look less like a piece of cloth sewn together though. yep.  not cover it up, just help it out a little bit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Fashion Police</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1642</link> <dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:04:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1642</guid> <description>See, it would be SO much more fun if we&#039;d just made you wear the dress complete with visible undies and no leggings allowed! But that would be too, too cruel... :) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, it would be SO much more fun if we&#8217;d just made you wear the dress complete with visible undies and no leggings allowed! But that would be too, too cruel&#8230; <img
src='http://www.thefashionpolice.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fashionista</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1641</link> <dc:creator>fashionista</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:42:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1641</guid> <description>see through dress
hopefully my underwear won&#039;t be shown (that clearly) in the dark </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see through dress<br
/> hopefully my underwear won&#8217;t be shown (that clearly) in the dark</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cp</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1640</link> <dc:creator>cp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:42:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1640</guid> <description>There&#039;s not really a contest here, I&#039;d wear the dress over whatever that is on the right any day.  Although, the skank outfit might be okay without the jeans at the beach in opposite world. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s not really a contest here, I&#8217;d wear the dress over whatever that is on the right any day.  Although, the skank outfit might be okay without the jeans at the beach in opposite world.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alexandra</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1639</link> <dc:creator>Alexandra</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:22:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1639</guid> <description>The dress! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dress!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
