<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wear or Die: Clubwear Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html</link>
	<description>Fashion dos and don&#039;ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:45:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diandra</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-22918</link>
		<dc:creator>Diandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-22918</guid>
		<description>The see-through dress! Or the silver thing as a swimsuit, if that&#039;s allowed, but it probably isn&#039;t. (Actually, with that crotch, forget it!)
At least with the see-through one I could say, &quot;oops, I didn&#039;t realize it was see through!&quot; I&#039;d take a wardrobe malfunction over something that says, &quot;no, I didn&#039;t look in the mirror before leaving the house!&quot;
The black dress is a little slutty (length-wise) but it might be alright with a solid black tube dress underneath and maybe a shrug? (to cover your shoulder area, not the dress!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The see-through dress! Or the silver thing as a swimsuit, if that&#8217;s allowed, but it probably isn&#8217;t. (Actually, with that crotch, forget it!)<br />
At least with the see-through one I could say, &#8220;oops, I didn&#8217;t realize it was see through!&#8221; I&#8217;d take a wardrobe malfunction over something that says, &#8220;no, I didn&#8217;t look in the mirror before leaving the house!&#8221;<br />
The black dress is a little slutty (length-wise) but it might be alright with a solid black tube dress underneath and maybe a shrug? (to cover your shoulder area, not the dress!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>dress with bright (red/pink)* cami underneath, and either black/white/(red/pink)* leggings underneath. paired with platform heels.
*if doing the red/pink, they have to match, not have one red and one pink.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dress with bright (red/pink)* cami underneath, and either black/white/(red/pink)* leggings underneath. paired with platform heels.<br />
*if doing the red/pink, they have to match, not have one red and one pink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pyro</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1646</link>
		<dc:creator>pyro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1646</guid>
		<description>Sadly, I think I would wear the wedgie top. That dress is just too tiny. At least with the top I would get pants, which would at least almost give me some tiny semblance of wearing clothes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I think I would wear the wedgie top. That dress is just too tiny. At least with the top I would get pants, which would at least almost give me some tiny semblance of wearing clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krystyna</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>Krystyna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>Obviously the see through dress on the left, but pair it with black leggies and a bright tee. Oooh.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously the see through dress on the left, but pair it with black leggies and a bright tee. Oooh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>The only twisted universe in which those abominations considered &quot;glam&quot; is one where two-dollar prostitutes are the height of sophistication.
I&#039;ll take the dress, but with a cami and black opaque tights.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only twisted universe in which those abominations considered &#8220;glam&#8221; is one where two-dollar prostitutes are the height of sophistication.<br />
I&#8217;ll take the dress, but with a cami and black opaque tights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celeste</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>Celeste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>i want to know how the models wearing these can actually have any dignity left.  especially the frontal wedgie thing. ouch.
i&#039;m going to have to say that i would wear the dress, which seems to be the trend here.  i would have to add a pair of jeans as well as a cute jacket in an attempt to make it look less like a piece of cloth sewn together though. yep.  not cover it up, just help it out a little bit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to know how the models wearing these can actually have any dignity left.  especially the frontal wedgie thing. ouch.<br />
i&#8217;m going to have to say that i would wear the dress, which seems to be the trend here.  i would have to add a pair of jeans as well as a cute jacket in an attempt to make it look less like a piece of cloth sewn together though. yep.  not cover it up, just help it out a little bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fashion Police</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>See, it would be SO much more fun if we&#039;d just made you wear the dress complete with visible undies and no leggings allowed! But that would be too, too cruel... :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, it would be SO much more fun if we&#8217;d just made you wear the dress complete with visible undies and no leggings allowed! But that would be too, too cruel&#8230; <img src='http://www.thefashionpolice.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fashionista</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1641</link>
		<dc:creator>fashionista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1641</guid>
		<description>see through dress
hopefully my underwear won&#039;t be shown (that clearly) in the dark
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see through dress<br />
hopefully my underwear won&#8217;t be shown (that clearly) in the dark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cp</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>cp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s not really a contest here, I&#039;d wear the dress over whatever that is on the right any day.  Although, the skank outfit might be okay without the jeans at the beach in opposite world.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s not really a contest here, I&#8217;d wear the dress over whatever that is on the right any day.  Although, the skank outfit might be okay without the jeans at the beach in opposite world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandra</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/fashion-polic-2-5.html#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=846#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>The dress!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dress!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
