<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Victoria Beckham and Uma Thurman buy  Antonio Berardi&#8217;s heelless shoes, Fashion Police decide not to bother</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html</link>
	<description>Fashion dos and don&#039;ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:44:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brodie roper</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html#comment-7491</link>
		<dc:creator>brodie roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2136#comment-7491</guid>
		<description>wow this shoe is very un-attractive i would think it to look terible with any and every outfit.. horrid materials, straps look terrible.. all in all id rather hookers shoes because they look better :-) and would be more comfortable
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow this shoe is very un-attractive i would think it to look terible with any and every outfit.. horrid materials, straps look terrible.. all in all id rather hookers shoes because they look better <img src='http://www.thefashionpolice.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  and would be more comfortable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gesztenye</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html#comment-7490</link>
		<dc:creator>Gesztenye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2136#comment-7490</guid>
		<description>Its simply just.... ugly! Soooo ugly!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its simply just&#8230;. ugly! Soooo ugly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html#comment-7489</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2136#comment-7489</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen several pairs of these and I think they are about the ugliest piece of footwear ever created - and completely impractical.  The only place these things could possibly be acceptable is on the foot of a drag-queen.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen several pairs of these and I think they are about the ugliest piece of footwear ever created &#8211; and completely impractical.  The only place these things could possibly be acceptable is on the foot of a drag-queen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivia</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html#comment-7488</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2136#comment-7488</guid>
		<description>Omg! how do you walk in those? :0 horrible.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omg! how do you walk in those? :0 horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html#comment-7487</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2136#comment-7487</guid>
		<description>This is the stupidest thing I&#039;ve ever seen! Don&#039;t do it, Ladies! Just DON&#039;T!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the stupidest thing I&#8217;ve ever seen! Don&#8217;t do it, Ladies! Just DON&#8217;T!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: britbikegirl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html#comment-7486</link>
		<dc:creator>britbikegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2136#comment-7486</guid>
		<description>They look slightly more comfortable than my fluevog grand nationals, minus the hoof print...http://www.fluevog.com/gifs/dec-04-news-image-04.jpg
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They look slightly more comfortable than my fluevog grand nationals, minus the hoof print&#8230;http://www.fluevog.com/gifs/dec-04-news-image-04.jpg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html#comment-7485</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2136#comment-7485</guid>
		<description>the model&#039;s feet R all red from wearing them
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the model&#8217;s feet R all red from wearing them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html#comment-7484</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2136#comment-7484</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re totally cool!  Anyone who&#039;s ever tottered around in 5-inch stilettos knows that the heel provides only the bare minimum support anyway.  You can see that the base of this shoe supports much farther back on the arch than a regular heel, so it probably wouldn&#039;t be all that much less stable.  It isn&#039;t as though anyone&#039;s gonna go hiking in them.  I&#039;d love to try a pair.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re totally cool!  Anyone who&#8217;s ever tottered around in 5-inch stilettos knows that the heel provides only the bare minimum support anyway.  You can see that the base of this shoe supports much farther back on the arch than a regular heel, so it probably wouldn&#8217;t be all that much less stable.  It isn&#8217;t as though anyone&#8217;s gonna go hiking in them.  I&#8217;d love to try a pair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanequa</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html#comment-7483</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanequa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2136#comment-7483</guid>
		<description>These shoes are somewhat scary, yet I&#039;m oddly attracted to them. I must try them on to see if there really is some arch support in them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These shoes are somewhat scary, yet I&#8217;m oddly attracted to them. I must try them on to see if there really is some arch support in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Claire</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/02/antonio-berardi.html#comment-7482</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=2136#comment-7482</guid>
		<description>I agree! Pretty cool for fashion photography maybe, but for actually SUPPORTING YOUR WEIGHT? Um, I think not.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree! Pretty cool for fashion photography maybe, but for actually SUPPORTING YOUR WEIGHT? Um, I think not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
