<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ski Pants Spotted at Topshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/ski-pants-spott.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/ski-pants-spott.html</link>
	<description>Fashion dos and don&#039;ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:20:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/ski-pants-spott.html#comment-2556</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1093#comment-2556</guid>
		<description>Well, I wouldn&#039;t say you got it wrong exactly, I mean, on their own, they are pretty vile but if you can&#039;t see the stirrup then no offence can be caused!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I wouldn&#8217;t say you got it wrong exactly, I mean, on their own, they are pretty vile but if you can&#8217;t see the stirrup then no offence can be caused!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fashion Police</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/ski-pants-spott.html#comment-2555</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1093#comment-2555</guid>
		<description>Lol! Polly, it just goes to show that even The Fashion Police get it wrong! I just couldn&#039;t for the life of me understand why they would be needed. Weird about the Ugg boot, though...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol! Polly, it just goes to show that even The Fashion Police get it wrong! I just couldn&#8217;t for the life of me understand why they would be needed. Weird about the Ugg boot, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/ski-pants-spott.html#comment-2554</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1093#comment-2554</guid>
		<description>Erm, I&#039;ve got these.  Mine came from primark and I love them.  And the reason for this outlandish statement is, one of my Ugg boots is tighter than the other (I did wonder for a long while if one of my legs was fatter than the other but thankfully a tapemeasure experiment proved that both my legs are just as fat as each other) anyway, back to the ski pant story, the tighter Ugg boot has a habit of twisting the leg of whatever leg covering I am wearing but if I wear ski pants, they stay in place.  Amazing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, I&#8217;ve got these.  Mine came from primark and I love them.  And the reason for this outlandish statement is, one of my Ugg boots is tighter than the other (I did wonder for a long while if one of my legs was fatter than the other but thankfully a tapemeasure experiment proved that both my legs are just as fat as each other) anyway, back to the ski pant story, the tighter Ugg boot has a habit of twisting the leg of whatever leg covering I am wearing but if I wear ski pants, they stay in place.  Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
