<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ski Pants Spotted at Topshop</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/ski-pants-spott.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/ski-pants-spott.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Polly</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/ski-pants-spott.html#comment-2556</link> <dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:21:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1093#comment-2556</guid> <description>Well, I wouldn&#039;t say you got it wrong exactly, I mean, on their own, they are pretty vile but if you can&#039;t see the stirrup then no offence can be caused! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I wouldn&#8217;t say you got it wrong exactly, I mean, on their own, they are pretty vile but if you can&#8217;t see the stirrup then no offence can be caused!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Fashion Police</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/ski-pants-spott.html#comment-2555</link> <dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:38:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1093#comment-2555</guid> <description>Lol! Polly, it just goes to show that even The Fashion Police get it wrong! I just couldn&#039;t for the life of me understand why they would be needed. Weird about the Ugg boot, though... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol! Polly, it just goes to show that even The Fashion Police get it wrong! I just couldn&#8217;t for the life of me understand why they would be needed. Weird about the Ugg boot, though&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Polly</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/ski-pants-spott.html#comment-2554</link> <dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:21:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1093#comment-2554</guid> <description>Erm, I&#039;ve got these.  Mine came from primark and I love them.  And the reason for this outlandish statement is, one of my Ugg boots is tighter than the other (I did wonder for a long while if one of my legs was fatter than the other but thankfully a tapemeasure experiment proved that both my legs are just as fat as each other) anyway, back to the ski pant story, the tighter Ugg boot has a habit of twisting the leg of whatever leg covering I am wearing but if I wear ski pants, they stay in place.  Amazing. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, I&#8217;ve got these.  Mine came from primark and I love them.  And the reason for this outlandish statement is, one of my Ugg boots is tighter than the other (I did wonder for a long while if one of my legs was fatter than the other but thankfully a tapemeasure experiment proved that both my legs are just as fat as each other) anyway, back to the ski pant story, the tighter Ugg boot has a habit of twisting the leg of whatever leg covering I am wearing but if I wear ski pants, they stay in place.  Amazing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
