Comments on: Sharon Stone looks pregnant, wears clashing animal prints

By: Sophia

Sophia — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:29:00 +0000

1) Maybe she needs the pouch to keep some snacks.
2) Animal print on Animal print is overkill.

By: Alicia

Alicia — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:56:52 +0000

I love leopard print so I have nothing against it, but I think it should have either been the shoes or the dress. And considering that the dress has a stomach pouch, she should have gone with the shoes.
And does the fact that the inside of her coat has a plaid lining that’s right up against her animal print dress not bother anyone but me?

By: Claire

Claire — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:07:44 +0000

First I think the three animal thing is a bit much: leopard, cheetah and marsupial.
Next, I think you can mix different prints as long as the items are smaller and not next to each other. Say a clutch and shoes or a shirt and shoes with pants to separate them.

By: Hannah

Hannah — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:27:10 +0000

Sorry to say but leopard print on an “older” woman makes them look like whores… Sharon Stone should stick to basic colours – even lipstick red would be better than this thing… the shoes aren’t even the right print as the dress so look horrible.

By: Hannah

Hannah — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:27:04 +0000

By: Jenna Maria

Jenna Maria — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:04:06 +0000

I have another question: Is wearing animal print really that attractive?
The marsupial pouch might make it easier to have a good lunch out, but it looks really bad.
The shoes are an odd choice, too; but top off the strangeness of the outfit in a fitting way.