<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Wear or Die: American Apparel edition</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Flux</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html#comment-31605</link> <dc:creator>Flux</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:28:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1134#comment-31605</guid> <description>I&#039;d start hitting myself over the head with the weights right away- die!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d start hitting myself over the head with the weights right away- die!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Leh</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html#comment-24472</link> <dc:creator>Leh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:07:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1134#comment-24472</guid> <description>Booty shorts... heck, it&#039;d be fun laughing at myself.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Booty shorts&#8230; heck, it&#8217;d be fun laughing at myself.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Fashion Police</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html#comment-2698</link> <dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:26:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1134#comment-2698</guid> <description>Aww, lissy, don&#039;t be embarrassed! Everyone has different taste and we just do this for fun - would be pretty boring if everyone dressed the same all the time! Eek at the see-through-ness, though - that could be very embarrassing! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww, lissy, don&#8217;t be embarrassed! Everyone has different taste and we just do this for fun &#8211; would be pretty boring if everyone dressed the same all the time! Eek at the see-through-ness, though &#8211; that could be very embarrassing!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lissy</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html#comment-2697</link> <dc:creator>lissy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:47:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1134#comment-2697</guid> <description>i actually bought the hotpants, but the high waisted version. if anyone else is thinking of doing this, they are see-through!
though i dont know why anyone else would buy them. i&#039;m embarrassed to say that i did. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i actually bought the hotpants, but the high waisted version. if anyone else is thinking of doing this, they are see-through!<br
/> though i dont know why anyone else would buy them. i&#8217;m embarrassed to say that i did.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pyro</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html#comment-2696</link> <dc:creator>pyro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:51:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1134#comment-2696</guid> <description>the shorts aren&#039;t actually that bad... just kinda like volleyball shorts... i think i&#039;d go with the hotpants. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the shorts aren&#8217;t actually that bad&#8230; just kinda like volleyball shorts&#8230; i think i&#8217;d go with the hotpants.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Haley</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html#comment-2695</link> <dc:creator>Haley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:55:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1134#comment-2695</guid> <description>The hot pants are actually bikini bottoms, I have them, but I don&#039;t wear them because they&#039;re too small.  Although for the record, as a teenager, I do not fear lamé swimsuits. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hot pants are actually bikini bottoms, I have them, but I don&#8217;t wear them because they&#8217;re too small.  Although for the record, as a teenager, I do not fear lamé swimsuits.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Fashion Police</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html#comment-2694</link> <dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:28:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1134#comment-2694</guid> <description>Gemma - I KNEW it reminded me of someone! Borat! Hee!
Hannah - I can&#039;t believe I missed the fact that it can&#039;t be worn near chlorine or salt water. And I&#039;m going to have to go and lie down now while I come to terms with the fact that AA are actually expecting people to wear this for no practical purpose... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gemma &#8211; I KNEW it reminded me of someone! Borat! Hee!<br
/> Hannah &#8211; I can&#8217;t believe I missed the fact that it can&#8217;t be worn near chlorine or salt water. And I&#8217;m going to have to go and lie down now while I come to terms with the fact that AA are actually expecting people to wear this for no practical purpose&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gemma</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html#comment-2693</link> <dc:creator>Gemma</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:59:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1134#comment-2693</guid> <description>Definitely the shorts. Thats swimsuit just makes me think of Borat...not a good look! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely the shorts. Thats swimsuit just makes me think of Borat&#8230;not a good look!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hannah</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html#comment-2692</link> <dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:01:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1134#comment-2692</guid> <description>Aaaah but!!! The website says that &quot;exposure to salt water and chlorine not recommended&quot; so you really couldn&#039;t hide it out in the water... it&#039;s really for posing on the beach. Urgh. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaah but!!! The website says that &#8220;exposure to salt water and chlorine not recommended&#8221; so you really couldn&#8217;t hide it out in the water&#8230; it&#8217;s really for posing on the beach. Urgh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Fashion Police</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2008/01/american-apparel-edition.html#comment-2691</link> <dc:creator>The Fashion Police</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:55:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=1134#comment-2691</guid> <description>See, my thinking on this one was that the swimsuit would spend most of its time under water, leaving you only to run the guantlet of embarasment from the changing room to the pool, while the shorts would be on display all the time. The swimsuit does make me want to throw up every time I look at it, though, so maybe even the promise of hiding it under water wouldn&#039;t be enough... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, my thinking on this one was that the swimsuit would spend most of its time under water, leaving you only to run the guantlet of embarasment from the changing room to the pool, while the shorts would be on display all the time. The swimsuit does make me want to throw up every time I look at it, though, so maybe even the promise of hiding it under water wouldn&#8217;t be enough&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
