Even more unflattering pants – will the madness never end?

Fashioncrime

It’s an "Unflattering Pants" epidemic, folks. Time to batten down the hatches, lock up your nice, well-fitting pants, and pray to God that the Unflattering Pants don’t take over the world – because they’re certainly giving it their best shot.

Once again, we’re indebted to Fashion Police reader Jannet, who submitted this picture. Now, I know some of you said you quite liked the low-crotched Topshop pants we featured earlier this week, but no one will ever convince me that this model doesn’t look like she’s wearing a nappy (or diaper, if you’re in the US) under these. Why else, after all, would you need such a baggy crotch area?

5 Comments

  • October 18, 2007

    Katie

    I teach preschool, and this is exactly how a kid’s pants look when they soak their Pull-Ups. No kidding.

    View Comment
  • October 18, 2007

    Cadi

    Yeah. THAT is frigging HIDEOUS. It’s like leggings and Hammer Pants bred, and this is the resulting offspring.

    View Comment
  • October 19, 2007

    cyrena

    Those are “churidar” pants, and they’re not supposed to be worn that way. They’re from India where they’re worn with long tunics called kurtas. You’re only supposed to see them from the knee down. They look really elegant if worn right and I hope this trend doesn’t pick up.

    View Comment
  • October 19, 2007

    GC

    I’d definitely wear if I wanted to look like I was in the midst of a bout of food poisoning.

    View Comment
  • October 20, 2007

    MyStarbucks

    Those are so ugly. Even a really thin model would not look good in those.

    View Comment