July 19th, 2007
Crime of Fashion: Antik Batik’s tulle casual “trousers”
Oh, you have GOT to be kidding me. Antik Batik are describing these as "trousers". These aren’t trousers. These? Are tights. Baggy tights. Footless tights. Baggy, footless tights with ruching. And if you think the front view is bad, the back view’s even worse, no? And if you think they’re bad in nude, wait till you see the purple and black versions… (Actually, scratch that. Nude’s the worst.)
Still, at least we know where Liza Minelli’s been doing her shopping.
I hope this doesn’t become a trend, I’d hate to see it on all the tourists here in Orlando. The midriff hanging out trend is bad enough without adding see-through pants!
Their price is kind of outrageous too…
oh. my. god.
Aaaaarghh! I’m blind!
what is the point of them??????
That is so weird, why would any designer even think they would sell? You might as well let it all hang out.
Not only are they hideously ugly, they also look uncomfortable. I’d imagine they wouldn’t breathe well and you’d end up with sweaty tulle stuck to your butt.
Sweet mother of Jesus, I have nightmares that I go out and have nothing but tights on! Trousers that are like tights, what the hell, it´s not only a tremendous crime of fashion, I think it should be illeagal to walk around like that.
Extremely illegal….
I can’t imagine ANYONE wearing those here in Canada.. no, scratch that, anywhere in the WORLD unless you’re dancing near a pole. (Not to be disparaging to strippers, but it would kind of go with that style on the stage)…
They kind of look like harem pants.. in a twisted way
Wtf is that? I’m in shock, and I thank God that I have never had to witness anyone wearing anything like that in real life. Peace.
What the chuff…a waste of fabric and manpower.