<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Crime of Fashion: Isabella Fiore&#8217;s &#8216;Luck&#8217; wallet</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2007/06/crime_of_fashio_1-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2007/06/crime_of_fashio_1-2.html</link> <description>Fashion Police Blog:  The World&#039;s Worst Fashion Trends!</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Designer Handbags</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2007/06/crime_of_fashio_1-2.html#comment-1120</link> <dc:creator>Designer Handbags</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:41:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=441#comment-1120</guid> <description>That&#039;s a low blow........I think it does LOOK like it says LUCK. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a low blow&#8230;&#8230;..I think it does LOOK like it says LUCK.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Posey</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2007/06/crime_of_fashio_1-2.html#comment-1119</link> <dc:creator>Posey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:57:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=441#comment-1119</guid> <description>Yes! I quite agree!
Although at first glance (before reading) I saw:
1/ Cuck
2/ Tuck
Only then did I see.. Yeah, Britney would just love it!
x
On an unrealted topic, that Topshop dress has still not emerged, did you manage to track it down? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! I quite agree!<br
/> Although at first glance (before reading) I saw:<br
/> 1/ Cuck<br
/> 2/ Tuck<br
/> Only then did I see.. Yeah, Britney would just love it!<br
/> x<br
/> On an unrealted topic, that Topshop dress has still not emerged, did you manage to track it down?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Posey</title><link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2007/06/crime_of_fashio_1-2.html#comment-1118</link> <dc:creator>Posey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:56:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=441#comment-1118</guid> <description>Yes! I quite agree!
Although at first glance (before reading) I saw:
1/ Cuck
2/ Tuck
Only then did I see.. Yeah, Britney would just love it!
x
On an unrealted topic, that Topshop dress has still not emerged, did you manage to track it down? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! I quite agree!<br
/> Although at first glance (before reading) I saw:<br
/> 1/ Cuck<br
/> 2/ Tuck<br
/> Only then did I see.. Yeah, Britney would just love it!<br
/> x<br
/> On an unrealted topic, that Topshop dress has still not emerged, did you manage to track it down?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
