<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crime of Fashion: Isabella Fiore&#8217;s &#8216;Luck&#8217; wallet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2007/06/crime_of_fashio_1-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2007/06/crime_of_fashio_1-2.html</link>
	<description>Fashion dos and don&#039;ts, delivered daily with a touch of snark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Designer Handbags</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2007/06/crime_of_fashio_1-2.html#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>Designer Handbags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=441#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a low blow........I think it does LOOK like it says LUCK.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a low blow&#8230;&#8230;..I think it does LOOK like it says LUCK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posey</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2007/06/crime_of_fashio_1-2.html#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Posey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=441#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Yes! I quite agree!
Although at first glance (before reading) I saw:
1/ Cuck
2/ Tuck
Only then did I see.. Yeah, Britney would just love it!
x
On an unrealted topic, that Topshop dress has still not emerged, did you manage to track it down?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! I quite agree!<br />
Although at first glance (before reading) I saw:<br />
1/ Cuck<br />
2/ Tuck<br />
Only then did I see.. Yeah, Britney would just love it!<br />
x<br />
On an unrealted topic, that Topshop dress has still not emerged, did you manage to track it down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posey</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2007/06/crime_of_fashio_1-2.html#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Posey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.167/thefashionpolice.net/?p=441#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>Yes! I quite agree!
Although at first glance (before reading) I saw:
1/ Cuck
2/ Tuck
Only then did I see.. Yeah, Britney would just love it!
x
On an unrealted topic, that Topshop dress has still not emerged, did you manage to track it down?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! I quite agree!<br />
Although at first glance (before reading) I saw:<br />
1/ Cuck<br />
2/ Tuck<br />
Only then did I see.. Yeah, Britney would just love it!<br />
x<br />
On an unrealted topic, that Topshop dress has still not emerged, did you manage to track it down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
