Midas Media ShoeperWoman Hey Dollface Forever Amber Keeping it Realtor Writing World Grumpy Bloggers Rubinman
graphics
graphic

September 27th, 2006

Fashion Criminal: Kirsten Dunst

Kirsten_dunst_1Oh, why, Kirsten, for the love of Dog, why? OK, we can get you off on a technicality here with the shorts and t-shirt – sure, they’re not exactly your finest moment, but they’re hardly what you’d call offensive.

No, the problem here is the shoes and socks, Kirsten. Either one alone would be enough to get you questioned by The Fashion Police, but together? Together they’re a true crime of fashion, and I think you know it, Kirsten, don’t you? I mean, why do you even have a pair of shoes like that in your wardrobe? You could be done for possession alone with those, and the socks? Oh Lord, where do we start with the socks?

Disappointing, Kirsten. But no, not entirely unexpected.


2 Responses to “Fashion Criminal: Kirsten Dunst”

  1. Julian Sader says:

    Perhaps Kirsten Dunst is going for an kind of naughty schoolgirl look. Quite sexy, in fact.

  2. Julian Sader says:

    Perhaps Kirsten Dunst is going for a kind of naughty schoolgirl look. Quite sexy, in fact.

Leave a Reply

Fashion Police Comment Policy

> No personal attacks or abuse: criticize clothes, not people! (This includes derogatory comments about weight.)
> No self-promotion, i.e. spam
> Please keep your comments on-topic and email us directly with more general feedback/questions.
> Remember, The Fashion Police is a light-hearted site that is not intended to be taken too seriously, so any comments that break these rules will be removed.


CommentLuv Enabled





 
graphic
 
 
graphicEdinburgh Web Design
graphicSubscribe
graphicFollow Us
graphicBecome a Fan
graphicContact
graphicPrivacy Policy